08 19

Sample essay on leader

Leadership is a common and quite simple word but rather very difficult word to define due to its complexity and multifaceted composition. According to Bass (1981) leadership can be defined in different ways: It is an act of influencing activities of an organized group in its quest to set goals and also to achieve certain goals. He also defined leadership to mean the influence that somebody exercises in a situation by means of communication in order to attain a specified goal. However in order to be a leader you require a variety of qualities. A good leader is one who doesn’t know everything: trying to imagine that effective leadership is related to knowing everything is one of the most dangerous misconceptions in the field of leadership. So as much as the final decision and responsibility lies with one individual, it is important for him/her to gather other peoples’ opinions or views and respects them before making a final decision on an issue.

To be a good leader one also need to be open to change. This is one of the obvious factors that take place in life including areas where we work but has remained strongly resisted by mankind. However effective leadership demands that we anticipate all changes whether minor or major and respond to them promptly to allow growth to take place. On other hand however, it is also important to understand some of the attributes associated with bad leadership in life so as to avoid them completely when one is aspiring to be a leader. In order to be a leader one should avoid being a buddy boss. This character is normally exhibited when a manger make buddies instead of being a leader after failing to acquire the recognition of a leader amongst employees. Experts hold it that bosses can never be buddies with their employees; in fact their power and authority are always neutralized by friendships. Such relationships are always known to cloud the objectivity of a leader and hinder his/her ability to correct behaviours, delegate and to hold employees accountable for their responsibilities, omissions or commissions. As a person strive to climb the ladder of good leadership, it is important to avoid disorganization at workplace because such behaviour always leads to having employees without direction just like their leaders. In fact disorganized leaders don’t always guide their teams properly because they don’t deliver and manage their plans and strategies appropriately.

- Leader Being A Sample motive-art.org Essay

Being A Leader Essay Sample - motive-art.org

sample essay on leader Essay on Political Leader - DoMyPapers.com

It has served as an indispensable factor in defining our civilization throughout the history. Our understanding of the past is greatly concerned with studies of leaders, who have shaped the course of history. Today people look at leaders and try to predict what lies ahead of their life. Our vision of contemporary leaders is believed to provide the hints about how our future will look like in years from now. From this perspective studies of ancient political thought and concept of leadership play a vital role for deep analysis of contemporary leaders.

An interesting perspective on leadership we find in works of Hobbes and Plato. Both philosophers approach concept of leader from rather different angles, providing their own background to it. Hobbes1, for example, emphasizes obedience and fear as great motivators that establish a power of a leader in society. Plato2, on contrary, suggests rather philosophical rulership, where leader uses his intellectual and moral power, rather than his military superiority.

Hobbes in his concept of a leader appeals to a more primitive social strategy. Perhaps, this can be explained by his timidity. Thus, if city-state is more civilized, the natural “fight-or-flight” reactions result in increased inner tensions.

In my opinion the best image of a modern leader is a mixture of two approaches. Plato’s leader will sustain dominance in a long-term perspective, while Hobbes’s leader will better respond to short-term necessities. The whip and the candy policy work best together. The best way to prove this is to look at the modern practice of leadership throughout the world. Systems that exploit different means to keep their people in constant fear inevitably collapse sooner or later, while those that promote democratic values and nurturing leadership keep prospering throughout the history.

Public leaders today should inspire people and mobilize resources in a way that gives a feeling of shared efforts.

It is essential for public leaders in the realm of political institutions, customs and laws. However, in times of crisis a strong, conservative approach is vital to conflict resolution. However, the extent to which this approach can be taken should always remain moral and never violate fundamental human rights.

We may say that Stalin and Hitler were leaders, but they were the kind of leaders that transgressed moral values and any permissible violation of human rights, including right for life. Slobodan Milosevic is more contemporary transgressor, who is currently charged for massive oppression and sanctioned killing of thousands of ethnic Albanians. His was the leadership advocated by Hobbes, but in practice it was taken to extreme.

Perhaps, in search for the best examples of leaders defined by Plato the first country to look for would have been the United States. However, today its presidential leadership rather falls under the concept defined by Hobbes instead.

This unprecedented situation represents a real danger to the entire concept of freedom and democracy, since exceptions are hard to define and the fear of terrorism, which is so skillfully supported among the citizens by mass media. Instead of exception to a general rule such situation may lead to a change of general rule and the forecast made by Michael Moore in his documental movie Fahrenheit 9/11 may come true in the nearest future.

There is an old saying, which says “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” We may assume that it’s only natural if a leader, who is granted with power to manage the country and respond to threats against this country, is taking his responsibilities seriously and is driven to gain more power in order to accomplish these tasks most successfully. However, even the founding fathers recognized the need for human beings to be limited in their power over the country and other peoples’ lives, since only then the government could function in the best interest of its nation and would not allow tyranny to develop.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>