09 13

What is the quality of research

[19]

  • 15 July - the Minister for Education, Science and Training, Dr Brendan Nelson’s announcement to abolish the Australian Research Council Board. As part of the Review of the Corporate Governance of Statutory Authorities and Office Holders (Uhrig Report), of the ARC, Minister Nelson has made the decision to abolish the ARC’s Board in favour of an executive management system. In 2004 the Minister exercised his power under the ARC Act to reject grants recommended for funding by the ARC Board. [20]
  • 17 August - AVCC released an updated proposal for the Research Quality Framework as a work-in-progress.
  • what is the quality of research How to critically evaluate the quality of a research.

    what is the quality of research Indicators of Journal Quality - Research Online

    The initiative is expected to more than double existing scholarships for the Asia-Pacific over the next five years, and was scheduled to commence on 1 July 2006.[29]
  • 4 May - AVCC Chief Executive Officer John Mullarvey recommended told the Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education Legislation Committee that universities had concerns about a number of changes proposed in the ARC Amendment Bill.[30]
  • 9 May - 2006-2007 Budget is released.[31]
  • 10 May - Senate Committee is scheduled to release its findings.[32]
  • 21 July - Australian Labor Party Shadow Minister for Education Jenny Macklin releases Australia's Universities: Building our future in the World – A White Paper on Higher Education, Research and Innovation.
  • RAND focuses on the issues that matter most: health, education, national security, international affairs, law and business, the environment, and more. The quality of RAND's research and the importance of its contributions to its clients and sponsors as well as to the public good have earned RAND an enviable reputation.

    In the six decades since RAND's establishment, its work has changed in many respects. Policy issues have become more complex and dynamic. The scope of RAND's research agenda has expanded. Its clients and sponsors have diversified, as have the research products and services they require. Research methodologies and technologies have advanced. Data and information have multiplied. Nevertheless, throughout six decades of change, one aspect of RAND's research has never changed—its commitment to high quality and objectivity. Every RAND report, article, database, and presentation is carefully peer-reviewed before its public release. RAND also conducts periodic external and internal reviews of its body of research.

    RAND's standards for high-quality research and analysis articulate longstanding RAND concepts and values regarding the characteristics of high-quality studies.

    The study should be compelling, useful, and relevant to stakeholders and decisionmakers.

    A high-quality study makes an impression and compels respectful attention; it cannot be ignored or dismissed by those working in the area it addresses.

    RAND conducts policy research that focuses on real-world problems and practical issues: Therefore, a high-quality study must be not only interesting but also useful. It must contribute to RAND's mission of helping to improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis.

    As a nonpartisan organization, RAND is widely respected for operating independently of political and commercial pressures. RAND's research style involves frequent interactions with its clients and sponsors, who are recognized as an important source of expertise; but because RAND conducts its research in the public interest, a high-quality study must also be relevant to other stakeholders in the policy domain. Interaction with a broad set of stakeholders can help to ensure the relevance of the research and the practicality of its recommendations.

    The study should be objective, independent, and balanced.

  • Professor Ian Chubb, Chair of the Group of Eight from November 2003 to September 2005, and Vice-Chancellor of Australian National University since 2001
  • Professor Peter Høj, CEO of the Australian Research Council since 1 October 2004
  • Dr Ian O Smith, Executive Director, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation since May 2004.
  • Dr Robin Batterham, chief technologist of Rio Tinto Group. Formerly chief scientist of Australia.
  • Professor Peter Sheehan, Chair of the AVCC's RQF working group, and currently Vice-Chancellor of the Australian Catholic University.
  • [33]
  • 4 August - AVCC submits its response to the Productivity Commission research study, recommending [34]:
    • increased investment in research and innovation from 1.6% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to 3% by 2020, and
    • new incentives for private sector participation in research
  • 30 August - AVCC issues a statement regarding Australian business investment in research and innovation, which was 0.86% for expenditure as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product, compared to the OECD average of 1.53%. The United States is at 1.87% and Japan at 2.36%.[35] Source: OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators Database 2006.
  • October 2006 - The RQF – Development Advisory Group (DAG), headed by Chief Scientist Jim Peacock, provided Minister Julie Bishop with the "Recommended Model".
  • Comments

    1. Hoxexaneziza

      I will surely research and provide you the whole context of it

    2. Vahoyik

      American Vehicular Sciences is a subsidiary of , a notorious NPE.

    3. Xogesabip

      I was still for the most part in dude mode out of college but I worked in research for 3.5 yrs and it took 6 months to find an intern job

    4. Xahiyupur

      I feel your pain. There"s another danger: raising those issues can potentially get you frozen out of colleagues" research.

    5. Voxihowefoqoc

      Pope Francis: No Research Justifies Killing Human Embryos, Unborn Babies “Precious in the Eyes of God”

    6. Wibulelezojibe

      I have done plenty of research thanks

    7. Fegebujabatofe

      I"m still doing research, awaiting confirmation of facts. Until then I have no opinion.

    8. Betujoneqokero

      77% of LinkedIn members research ;randed products or services on the network. ( Sou ce: PunchMedia )

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>